01. Employee Engagement Introduction
In present
organizational context employee plays a vital role and contemporary
organizations should consider them as an asset instead of direct
cost (Beer et al, 1984). Further Boxall and Purcell (2016) discuss
that Human Resource is dynamic and unique resource it varies person to
person therefore it must be managed very carefully further he explains Human
Resource is very sensitive and reacting to either positively or negatively to the
way of managing it. Therefore it is very important to recognize of people
and invest in them as a source of ‘human capital advantage’ rather than
applying cost cutting initiatives (Boxall and Purcell, 2016).
In contemporary organizations
Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) mainly focuses on following themes
(Itika, 2011).
• Strategic
resourcing and talent management
• Learning
and Development
• Employee
Relations
• The
Design of Work
• Rewards
and Employee Engagement
• Organisational
Culture
• Ethics
and HRM
• Managing
Diversity
• Change
Management
Human Resource Management in a contemporary
organization is built on these theories and each of them are equally important
and failure of one area may be cost failure of whole organisation (Itika,
2011). Among these themes Employee relation plays vital role in SHRM because as
per Daniel (2003) “If relationships are strong, then employees are more likely
to be satisfied with their jobs and more productive as a result” (Daniel, 2003,
p. 56) according to Daniel (2003) final outcome of a succeed employee
relationship is having a highly engaged workforce. Engaged employees are always
satisfied with their job and
will stay with the company for long time and they
always look for new effective ways of value addition to the organization
therefore the end result is a high performing company where people are flourishing and productivity is increased and sustained
(Catteeuw et al., 2007).
As per Catteeuw (2007) defining only satisfaction
and long term employment will not meet the Employee Engagement threshold but
most important criteria is looking for new effective ways of value addition to
the organization. In Sri Lankan Public-sector organizations above two criteria
of Long term employment and employees satisfaction can be
seen abundantly but value addition to the organisation cannot be seen. As an
example Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) Employees have satisfaction with their
jobs because relatively their salary scales are higher than other government
organisations and they have relax working environment due to plentiful number
of workforce. Further they are having good recognition within the society as
well. However, these employees are not actively engaged contributing little
value to the development of the organisation. Therefore Customer Loyalty, one
of main outcome of an Employee engagement cannot be seen towards these
organisations.
Kahn (1990) defines Employee Engagement as
“the harnessing of organization members’ selves to their work roles; in
engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively, and
emotionally during role performances” (Kahn,1990, p.694). Further Saks (2006)
says it is not merely an attitude but it is degree to which an individual is
focused to their work and become success of their role. Employee Engagement
shows the level of commitment and involvement of an employee towards their
organization and its values. Engaged Employee is having positive feelings
toward his work, find their work to be personally meaningful and manageable,
and he has the confidence about the future of his work (Saks, 2006). Kenexa
Employee Engagement Index shares four emotional states which an actively
engaged employee is having as follows (Kenexa, 2008),
1. I am proud
to work for my organization.
2. Overall, I
am extremely satisfied with my organization as a place to work.
3. I would
gladly refer a good friend or family member to my organization for employment.
4. I rarely
think about looking for a new job with another organization.
According to the
Karsan and Kruse (2011) Employee Engagement is the level of employees’
motivation to contribute to organizational success and are willing to apply
unrestricted effort to accomplishing tasks on achievement of organizational
goals. Further they reveal that employee engagement can be measured and it is a
combination of pride, satisfaction, advocacy, and retention
(Petracoach,2017)
Hi Suresh. You have perfectly identified the importance of employee engagement to an organisation. Furthermore, whilst it is acknowledged that employee engagement has been defined in many different ways, it is also argued the definitions often sound similar to other better known and established constructs such as ‘organisational commitment’ and ‘organisational citizenship behavior’ (OCB) (Robinson et al 2004).
ReplyDelete